View Post [edit]
Poster: | augustwest1958 | Date: | Dec 30, 2008 8:54am |
Forum: | GratefulDead | Subject: | Re: 1990's Dead Volume ? |
Reply [edit]
Poster: | sambonk2 | Date: | Dec 30, 2008 12:16pm |
Forum: | GratefulDead | Subject: | Re: 1990's Dead Volume ? |
This post was modified by sambonk2 on 2008-12-30 20:16:21
Reply [edit]
Poster: | augustwest1958 | Date: | Dec 30, 2008 1:59pm |
Forum: | GratefulDead | Subject: | Re: 1990's Dead Volume ? |
As good as the Other Ones (or whatever Weir and Lesh were calling themselves in about 2003 or so), the highlight of the show I saw was an *instrumental* Stella.
Reply [edit]
Poster: | Styrofoam Cueball | Date: | Dec 30, 2008 10:30pm |
Forum: | GratefulDead | Subject: | Re: 1990's Dead Volume ? |
Reply [edit]
Poster: | sambonk2 | Date: | Dec 30, 2008 3:41pm |
Forum: | GratefulDead | Subject: | Re: 1990's Dead Volume ? |
Reply [edit]
Poster: | augustwest1958 | Date: | Dec 30, 2008 5:09pm |
Forum: | GratefulDead | Subject: | Re: 1990's Dead Volume ? |
You also answer another of my questions. I had wondered whether shows that have 0 reviews and were not downloaded many times meant that I should ignore. Obviously the answer is "No".
Thanks for the tip !
Reply [edit]
Poster: | augustwest1958 | Date: | Dec 30, 2008 5:20pm |
Forum: | GratefulDead | Subject: | Re: 1990's Dead Volume ? |
You also answer another of my questions. I had wondered whether shows that have 0 reviews and were not downloaded many times meant that I should ignore. Obviously the answer is "No".
Thanks for the tip !
Reply [edit]
Poster: | sambonk2 | Date: | Dec 31, 2008 5:23am |
Forum: | GratefulDead | Subject: | Re: 1990's Dead Volume ? |
let me know what ya think?
http://www.archive.org/details/gd93-06-23.sbd.braverman.14123.sbeok.shnf